The GHP in its methods 2 and 3 uses the moisture (H) as unit of 
    drug strength (UDS) in order to calculate the amount of alcohol 
    necessary to prepare the MT. 
    
    In method 2 we add one part of solvent for each part of 
    moisture. So if  the moisture has the value H, we must add H 
    parts of solvent to obtain 2 H volumes of MT (although we should 
    say aprox. 2 H, because of the substances soluble in water which 
    are extracted during the preparation and which are not taken 
    into account by the GHP).  The drug strength (DS) is the 
    fraction that indicates how much parts of the MT contain one 
    unit of drug strength (UDS).
    
    
    Since each UDS is contained is 2 parts of MT,  the DS of this 
    method is 1/2. 
    
    The WSP considers as UDS, not the moisture of the plant, but the 
    juice. Therefore in method 2 we must add one part of solvent for 
    each part of  juice, and using a similar reasoning that each UDS 
    is contained in 2 parts of MT, the DS of this MT is also 1/2. 
    
    Now when we have a MT prepared following the GHP, seen form the 
    point  of view of the WSP, we have a DS  related to the juice 
    (J), and therefore  we must express this DS as parts of MT which 
    contain one part of juice  (J), while we consider to have a 
    final volume of 
    
    
    In this case each UDS is contained in x parts of MT, and the 
    DS from the point of view of the WSP is 1/x. Since x is always 
    smaller than 2, 1/x  will always be greater than 1/2 which shows 
    that the MT prepared  following the GHP, but seen from the point 
    of view of the WSP will always be more concentrated. This 
    difference will be larger as the DR of  the juice is higher. 
    
    Lets give an example. Suppose we have a plant with 70% of 
    moisture (H) and 10% of dry residue (DR).  We prepare two MT 
    following  method 2 of each pharmacopoeia. Then to prepare our 
    first potency by WSP, we take 2 parts of the MT for  each part 
    of juice we need and  proceed to add solvent up to 10 or 100 
    parts (for the decimal or centesimal scale resp.) Now, if we use 
    the MT prepared by the GHP, and if we want to obtain the same 
    concentration for our first potency, we should take the same 
    amount of juice (which corresponds to 1 part of UDS) and which 
    is contained in x parts of MT.
    
    
    However the DS given in both pharmacopoeias is the same, and in 
    theory we should also have taken 2 parts. 
    
    The percentual difference (d%) can be calculated based on the 
    quantity we should use to have first potencies with the same 
    concentration, and the quantity we normally take following the 
    DS of the pharmacopoeia we use.
    
    To obtain a general formula we can state that 
    
 
    
 
    
      - 
      theorical part we should use to obtain equal concentration 
    
 
      - 
      parts we really use following the pharmacopoeia 
    
    
 
      - 
      difference in absolute value  (=d) 
    
 
 
    
    if
    then
    
    
    Comparing the 2 pharmacopoeias in method 2 we can replace 
    by x' (=2) and 
    by x 
    , then  we have: 
    
    
    Should we use a MT prepared by method 3 we have 
    and 
    then    
    
    
    We obtain exactly the same formula which proves that the 
    difference is independent of the final weight or volume of the 
    MT and solely depends on the UDS considered in each case. 
    
    This formula enables us to quantify the percentual difference 
    between the quantity of MT we should use, and the one we really 
    use to prepare our first potency according to the DS of each 
    pharmacopoeia.